"Globalisierung." . . "Globalisierung" . "Distributive justice." . . "Distributive justice" . "Menschenrecht." . . "Menschenrecht" . "Organismos internacionales." . . "Internationale aspecten." . . "Droits de l'homme (Droit international)" . . "Verantwortung." . . "Verantwortung" . "Organisation internationale." . . "Soziale Gerechtigkeit." . . "Soziale Gerechtigkeit" . "Verteilungsgerechtigkeit." . . "Verantwoordelijkheid." . . "Mondialisation." . . "POLITICAL SCIENCE Globalization." . . "Nationale aspecten." . . "Derechos humanos." . . "Globalization - Political aspects." . . "Globalization Political aspects." . "Globalization Political aspects" . "Organisations internationales." . . "droits de l'homme - internationalisation globalisation (mondialisation)" . . "Rechtvaardigheid." . . "Globalizacja." . . "Universalität." . . "Universalität" . "cosmopolitisme justice distributive responsabilité." . . "Electronic books." . . "Justice sociale." . . "Drets humans." . . "Mondialisation Aspect politique." . . "Sociale verantwoordelijkheid." . . "Cosmopolitisme." . . "Justícia distributiva." . . "Justicia distributiva." . "Cosmopolitanism." . . "Cosmopolitanism" . "Sociale rechtvaardigheid." . . "Oxford University Press." . . "International agencies." . . "International agencies" . "Political Science." . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "This book presents a non-cosmopolitan theory of global justice. In contrast to theories that seek to extend principles of social justice, such as equality of opportunity or resources, to the world as a whole, it argues that in a world made up of self-determining national communities, a different conception is needed. The book presents and defends an account of national responsibility which entails that nations may justifiably claim the benefits that their decisions and policies produce, while also being held liable for harms that they inflict on other peoples. Such collective responsibility extends to responsibility for the national past, so the present generation may owe redress to those who have been harmed by the actions of their predecessors. Global justice, therefore, must be understood not in terms of equality, but in terms of a minimum set of basic rights that belong to human beings everywhere. Where these rights are being violated or threatened, remedial responsibility may fall on outsiders. The book considers how this responsibility should be allocated, and how far citizens of democratic societies must limit their pursuit of domestic objectives in order to discharge their global obligations. The book presents a systematic challenge to existing theories of global justice without retreating to a narrow nationalism that denies that we have any responsibilities to the world's poor. It combines discussion of practical questions such as immigration and foreign aid with philosophical exploration of, for instance, the different senses of responsibility, and the grounds of human rights." . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "National responsibility and global justice"@en . "National responsibility and global justice" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "National Responsibility and Global Justice" . "Steering a middle course between cosmopolitanism and a narrow nationalism, the book develops an original theory of global justice that also addresses controversial topics such as immigration and reparations for historic wrongdoing." . . . . . "Electronic books"@en . "Electronic books" . . . . . . "\"This book presents a non-cosmopolitan theory of global justice. In contrast to theories that seek to extend principles of social justice, such as equality of opportunity or resources, to the world as a whole, it argues that in a world made up of self-determining national communities, a different conception is needed. The book presents and defends an account of national responsibility which entails that nations may justifiably claim the benefits that their decisions and policies produce, while also being held liable for harms that they inflict on other peoples. Such collective responsibility extends to responsibility for the national past, so the present generation may owe redress to those who have been harmed by the actions of their predecessors. Global justice, therefore, must be understood not in terms of equality, but in terms of a minimum set of basic rights that belong to human beings everywhere. Where these rights are being violated or threatened, remedial responsibility may fall on outsiders. The book considers how this responsibility should be allocated, and how far citizens of democratic societies must limit their pursuit of domestic objectives in order to discharge their global obligations. The book presents a systematic challenge to existing theories of global justice without retreating to a narrow nationalism that denies that we have any responsibilities to the world's poor. It combines discussion of practical questions such as immigration and foreign aid with philosophical exploration of, for instance, the different senses of responsibility, and the grounds of human rights' -- Publisher's description." . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Weltbürgertum." . . "Internationalisme." . . "Politisk filosofi" . . "Globalización Aspectos políticos." . . "Aspect politique." . . "Mondialisation Aspect social." . . "Cosmopolitismo." . . "Weltpolitik." . . "Justice distributive." . . "Globalització Aspectes polítics." . . "Moralfilosofi" . . "Human rights." . . "Human rights" . "Droits de l'homme." . . . .