"Relaciones internacionales." . . "Gerechtigkeit Friede Kongress Genf <2001>" . . "International relations History 19th century Congresses European Union countries." . . "Ethische aspecten." . . "Relations internationales Congrès." . . "Paix Congrès." . . "Justice." . . "Justice" . "morale relations internationales." . . "Paix." . . "International relations." . . "International relations" . "Justice History 19th century Congresses European Union countries." . . "Friedensvertrag." . . "Pau (Filosofia)" . . "Friedensrecht." . . "POLITICAL SCIENCE Peace." . . "Peace." . . "Peace" . "Politische Ethik." . . "Kongress Genf 2001." . . . "Friede." . . "Relations internationales." . . "Friede Gerechtigkeit Kongress Genf <2001>" . . "conflit international justice." . . "Friede Gerechtigkeit Aufsatzsammlung." . . "Gerechtigkeit." . . "Paz (Filosofía)" . . "Internationale Politik." . . "Peaceful change." . . "Friede Philosophie." . . . "What is a just peace?"@en . "What is a just peace?" . . . . . . . . . . "Aufsatzsammlung" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Electronic books" . "Electronic books"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Just War has attracted considerable attention. The words peace and justice are often used together. Surprisingly, however, little conceptual thinking has gone into what constitutes a Just Peace. This book, which includes some of the world's leading scholars, debates and develops the concept of Just Peace.The problem with the idea of a Just Peace is that striving for justice may imply a Just War. In other words, peace and justice clash at times. Therefore, one often starts from a given view of what constitutes justice, but this a priori approach leads - especially when imposed from the outside." . . . . . . . . "Conference papers and proceedings" . . "Conference papers and proceedings"@en . . . . "What is a Just Peace?" . . . . . "What is a just peace ?" . . . . . . . . "\"Just war has attracted considerable attention. The words peace and justice are often used together. Surprisingly, however, little conceptual thinking has gone into what constitutes a just peace. This book, which includes some of the world's leading scholars, debates and develops the concept of just peace. The problem with the idea of a just peace is that striving for justice may imply a just war. In other words, peace and justice clash at times. Therefore, one often starts from a given view of what constitutes justice, but this a priori approach leads--especially when imposed from the outside--straight into discord. This book presents conflicting viewpoints on this question from political, historical, and legal perspectives as well as from a policy perspective. This book also argues that a just peace is a mediated peace. It is just, because it is based on conventions that are negotiated and recognized by the parties. Mutual recognition is central: parties recognize each other as agents that have an identity. Consent is necessary, too: all parties need to approve a solution; therefore, each party needs to understand what allows the other to remain \"self.\" And renouncement: concessions are necessary, some symbols and positions need to be sacrificed. In this sense, the Geneva Initiative--the first comprehensive Israeli-Palestinian peace plan--is a mediated peace. Thus the book challenges a liberal view of peace founded on norms claiming universal scope. This liberal conception has difficulty in solving conflicts such as civil wars characterized typically by fundamental disagreements between different communities. Cultures make demands that are identity-defining, and some of these defy the \"cultural neutrality\" that is one of the foundations of liberalism. Thus, the concept of just peace cannot be solved within liberalism--nor for that matter within communitarianism.\"--Publisher description." . . . . . . . "Including contributions from some of the world's leading scholars, this book provides a carefully considered analysis of what constitutes a just peace. A cross-section of conflicting viewpoints from political, historical and legal perspectives are brought together to demonstrate how just peace has to be a mediated peace." . . . . . . . . . "Llibres electrònics" . "Just War has attracted considerable attention. The words peace and justice are often used together. Surprisingly, however, little conceptual thinking has gone into what constitutes a Just Peace. This book, which includes some of the world's leading scholars, debates and develops the concept of Just Peace. The problem with the idea of a Just Peace is that striving for justice may imply a Just War. In other words, peace and justice clash at times. Therefore, one often starts from a given view of what constitutes justice, but this a priori approach leads - especially when imposed from the outside - straight into discord. This book presents conflicting viewpoints on this question from political, historical, and legal perspectives as well as from a policy perspective.; The book also argues that Just Peace should be defined as a process resting on four necessary and sufficient conditions: thin recognition whereby the other is accepted as autonomous; thick recognition whereby identities need to be accounted for; renouncement, requiring significant sacrifices from all parties; and finally, rule, the objectification of a Just Peace by a \"text\" requiring a common language respecting the identities of each, and defining their rights and duties. This approach based on a language-oriented process amongst directly concerned parties, goes beyond liberal and culturalist perspectives. Throughout the process, negotiators need to build a novel shared reality as well as a new common language allowing for an enduring harmony between previously clashing peoples. It challenges a liberal view of peace founded on norms claiming universal scope. The liberal conception has difficulty in solving conflicts such as civil wars characterized typically by fundamental disagreements between different communities. Cultures make demands that are identity-defining, and some of these defy the \"cultural neutrality\" that is one of the foundations of liberalism.; Therefore, the concept of Just Peace cannot be solved within the liberal tradition." . . . . . . . "guerre justice paix." . . "Relacions internacionals." . . "Political Science." . . "Friedensethik." . . "Justice Congrès." . . "Electronic books." . . "Philosophy" . . "Philosophie Friede." . . "Vredesvraagstuk." . . . . "Peace History 19th century Congresses European Union countries." . .