WorldCat Linked Data Explorer

http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1059319155

Parting ways

"Judith Butler follows Edward Said's late suggestion that only through a consideration of Palestinian dispossession in relation to Jewish diasporic traditions will a new ethos for a one-state solution emerge. Butler engages some forms of Jewish intellectual criticism of political Zionism and its practices of illegitimate state violence, nationalism, and state-sponsored racism. At the same time, she moves beyond communitarian frameworks, including Jewish ones, that fail to arrive at a radical democratic notion of political cohabitation. As important as it is to dispute Israel's claim to represent the Jewish people, it is equally important, Butler argues, to show that a narrowly Jewish framework cannot suffice as a basis for an ultimate critique of Zionism. She promotes an ethical position in which the obligations of cohabitation do not derive from cultural sameness but from the unchosen character of social plurality. Recovering the arguments of Jewish thinkers who offered criticisms of Zionism or whose work could be used for such a purpose, Butler disputes the specific charge of anti-Semitic self-hatred often leveled against Jewish critiques of Israel. Her political ethic relies on a vision of cohabitation that exposes the limits of every communitarian framework, including Jewish ones, to overcome the colonial legacy of Zionism. Her own engagements with Said and Mahmoud Darwish are important to her articulation of the displacement of communitarian thought. Butler draws upon some Jewish traditions of thought to consider the rights of the dispossessed, the necessity of plural cohabitation, and the dangers of arbitrary state violence, showing how they can be extended to a critique of Zionism, even when that is not their purpose. Butler engages thinkers such as Edward Said, Emmanuel Levinas, Hannah Arendt, Primo Levi, Martin Buber, Walter Benjamin, and Mahmoud Darwish. She revisits and affirms Edward Said's late proposals for a one-state solution. Butler's startling suggestion: Jewish ethics not only demand a critique of Zionism, but must transcend its exclusive Jewishness in order to realize the ethical and political ideals of living together in radical democracy"--Provided by publisher.

Open All Close All

http://schema.org/about

http://schema.org/alternateName

  • "Parting ways"@pl
  • "Parting ways"@it
  • "Jewishness and the critique of Zionism"@en

http://schema.org/description

  • ""Judith Butler follows Edward Said's late suggestion that only through a consideration of Palestinian dispossession in relation to Jewish diasporic traditions will a new ethos for a one-state solution emerge. Butler engages some forms of Jewish intellectual criticism of political Zionism and its practices of illegitimate state violence, nationalism, and state-sponsored racism. At the same time, she moves beyond communitarian frameworks, including Jewish ones, that fail to arrive at a radical democratic notion of political cohabitation. As important as it is to dispute Israel's claim to represent the Jewish people, it is equally important, Butler argues, to show that a narrowly Jewish framework cannot suffice as a basis for an ultimate critique of Zionism. She promotes an ethical position in which the obligations of cohabitation do not derive from cultural sameness but from the unchosen character of social plurality. Recovering the arguments of Jewish thinkers who offered criticisms of Zionism or whose work could be used for such a purpose, Butler disputes the specific charge of anti-Semitic self-hatred often leveled against Jewish critiques of Israel. Her political ethic relies on a vision of cohabitation that exposes the limits of every communitarian framework, including Jewish ones, to overcome the colonial legacy of Zionism. Her own engagements with Said and Mahmoud Darwish are important to her articulation of the displacement of communitarian thought. Butler draws upon some Jewish traditions of thought to consider the rights of the dispossessed, the necessity of plural cohabitation, and the dangers of arbitrary state violence, showing how they can be extended to a critique of Zionism, even when that is not their purpose. Butler engages thinkers such as Edward Said, Emmanuel Levinas, Hannah Arendt, Primo Levi, Martin Buber, Walter Benjamin, and Mahmoud Darwish. She revisits and affirms Edward Said's late proposals for a one-state solution. Butler's startling suggestion: Jewish ethics not only demand a critique of Zionism, but must transcend its exclusive Jewishness in order to realize the ethical and political ideals of living together in radical democracy"--Provided by publisher."@en
  • "Dans cet ouvrage, Judith Butler s'interroge sur la possibilité d'articuler les expériences juives de la diaspora et du déplacement et les expériences palestiniennes de la dépossession pour fonder une nouvelle éthique de la cohabitation dans la région et renouer avec la solution politique d'un État binational. La cohabitation non voulue est une condition de notre vie politique, et non quelque chose que nous pouvons mettre à mal. Nul n'est en droit de choisir avec qui cohabiter sur cette terre. Judith Butler puise dans la philosophie juive de quoi élaborer une critique du sionisme politique, de la violence d'État, du nationalisme et du colonialisme de l'État d'Israël. Pour elle, il est important de mettre en question la prétention d'Israël à représenter les Juifs. Elle engage ainsi la discussion avec des auteurs comme Hannah Arendt, Emmanuel Levinas, Primo Levi, Martin Buber, Walter Benjamin, mais aussi Edward Said ou Mahmoud Darwich. Selon Judith Butler, l'éthique de la judéité exige une critique du sionisme et ouvre la possibilité de réaliser un idéal politique de cohabitation au sein d'une démocratie radicale."
  • "Hauptbeschreibung Kritiker des Staates Israel und seiner Siedlungspolitik geraten schnell unter den Verdacht des Antisemitismus - so auch die prominente jüdische Philosophin Judith Butler. In ihrem neuen Buch geht Butler der Frage nach, wie eine Kritik am Zionismus aus dem Judentum selbst heraus möglich, ja ethisch sogar zwingend ist. In einer eindringlichen Auseinandersetzung mit Hannah Arendt, Emmanuel Lévinas, Walter Benjamin, Primo Levi und den Palästinensern Edward Said und Mahmoud Darwish entwickelt sie eine neue jüdische Ethik, die sich gegen die von Israel ausgeübte und vom."

http://schema.org/genre

  • "Electronic books"
  • "Electronic books"@en

http://schema.org/name

  • "Am Scheideweg : Judentum und die Kritik am Zionismus"
  • "Parting ways"@en
  • "Vers la cohabitation"
  • "Am Scheideweg Judentum und die Kritik am Zionismus"
  • "Parting ways Jewishness and the critique of Zionism"
  • "Parting ways Jewishness and the critique of Zionism"@en
  • "Vers la cohabitation : judéité et critique du sionisme"
  • "Parting ways : Jewishness and the critique of zionism"
  • "Na rozdrożu : żydowskość i krytyka syjonizmu"
  • "Na rozdrożu : żydowskość i krytyka syjonizmu"@pl
  • "Parting ways : Jewishness and the critique of Zionism"@en
  • "Parting ways : Jewishness and the critique of Zionism"
  • "Strade che divergono : ebraicità e critica del sionismo"
  • "Strade che divergono : ebraicità e critica del sionismo"@it
  • "Parting ways : jewishness and the critique of zionism"