"Militært lederskab" . . "Commandement des troupes Histoire 20e siècle Études de cas." . . "Généraux États-Unis Histoire 20e siècle." . . "Militærhistorie" . . "Krigshistorie" . . "1900 - 1999" . . "Lederskab" . . "Command of troops History 20th century." . . "Military." . . . . . . "American military command from World War II to today" . . . "The generals : American military command from World War II to today" . "The generals : American military command from World War II to today"@en . . . . "大国与将军" . . . . "History has been kind to the American generals of World War II and less kind to the generals of the wars that followed. Setting out to explain why, Thomas E. Ricks cites a widening gulf between performance and accountability. Then, scores of American generals were relieved of command simply for not being good enough. Today, as one American colonel said bitterly, \"A private who loses a rifle suffers far greater consequences than a general who loses a war.\"" . . "Generals : american military command from world war ii to today"@en . . "Military history" . "Military history"@en . . . . "Da guo yu jiang jun" . . "Case studies" . "Case studies"@en . . "An epic history of the decline of American military leadership from World War II to Iraq."@en . "An epic history of the decline of American military leadership from World War II to Iraq." . "History has been kinder to the American generals of World War II - Marshall, Eisenhower, Patton, and Bradley - than to the generals of the wars that followed. Is it merely nostalgia? Thomas E. Ricks answers the question definitively: No, it is not, in no small part because of a widening gulf between performance and accountability. During the Second World War, scores of American generals were relieved of command simply for not being good enough. Today, as one American colonial said bitterly during the Iraq war, \"As matters stand now, a private who loses a rifle suffers far greater consequences than a general who loses a war.\" In chronicling the widening gulf between performance and accountability among the top brass of the U.S. military, Ricks tells the stories of great leaders and suspect ones, generals who rose to the occasion and generals who failed themselves and their soldiers. In Ricks's hands, this story resounds with larger meaning: about the transmission of values, about strategic thinking, and about the difference between an organization that learns and one that fails. -- Publisher description" . . . . . . . "History has been kinder to the American generals of World War II, Marshall, Eisenhower, Patton, and Bradley, than to the generals of the wars that followed. Is this merely nostalgia? In The Generals, Thomas E. Ricks answers the question definitively: No, it is not, in no small part because of a widening gulf between performance and accountability. During the Second World War, scores of American generals were relieved of command simply for not being good enough. Today as one American colonel said bitterly during the Iraq War, ''As matters stand now, a private who loses a rifle suffers far greater consequences than a general who loses a war.'' In The Generals we meet great leaders and suspect ones, generals who rose to the occasion and those who failed themselves and their soldiers. Marshall and Eisenhower cast long shadows over this story, but no single figure is more inspiring than Marine General O. P. Smith, whose fighting retreat from the Chinese onslaught into Korea in the winter of 1950 snatched a kind of victory from the jaws of annihilation. But Smith's courage and genius in the face of one of the grimmest scenarios the marines have ever faced only cast the shortcomings of the people who put him there in sharper relief. If Korea showed the first signs of a culture that neither punished mediocrity nor particularly rewarded daring, the Vietnam War saw American military leadership bottom out. The My Lai massacre is held up as the emblematic event of this dark chapter of our history. In the wake of Vietnam, a battle for the soul of the US Army was waged with impressive success. It became a transformed institution, reinvigorated from the bottom up. But if the body was highly toned, its head still suffered from familiar problems, resulting in leadership that, from the first Iraq War through to the present, was tactically savvy but strategically obtuse, one that would win battles but would end wars badly." . . "Electronic books"@en . . . . . . . . . . "An epic history of the decline of American military leadership?from the #1 bestselling author of Fiasco Thomas E. Ricks has made a close study of America's military leaders for three decades, and in The Generals, he chronicles the widening gulf between performance and accountability among the top brass of the U.S. military. While history has been kind to the American generals of World War II?Marshall, Eisenhower, Patton, and Bradley?it has been less kind to others, such as Koster, Franks, Sanchez, and Petraeus. Ricks sets out to explain why that is. We meet great leaders and suspect ones, generals who rose to the occasion and generals who failed themselves and their soldiers. In Ricks's hands, this story resounds with larger meaning: about the transmission of values, about strategic thinking, and about the difference between an organization that learns and one that fails."@en . "History"@en . "History" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Large type books" . . . . . . "The Generals"@en . . . . . . . "USA's hær" . . "History." . . "Generals United States Case studies." . . "Ledelse" . . "USA." . . "Militär." . . "Command of troops." . . "HISTORY Military General." . . "Führung." . . "Generals." . . "Føring" . . "Militærstrategi" . . "Command of troops History 20th century Case studies." . . "Command of troops / History / 20th century / Case studies." . "Militærpolitik" . . "General." . . "United States" . . "United States." . "United States / History, Military / 20th century / Case studies." . . "Nonfiction." . . "États-Unis" . . "Generals United States History 20th century." . . "Generals / United States / History / 20th century." .