An Examination of Options to Reduce Underway Training Days through the Use of Simulation

The U.S. Navy trains its surface combatant ship crews through a combination of shore-based, onboard pier-side, and underway training. Much of this training has traditionally involved significant periods of underway time, which allows units to achieve required certifications and readiness levels. Underway training is expensive, however, because fuel and consumables are expended while a ship is underway; wear and tear on operating equipment also drive up maintenance costs. One day's worth of fuel for one surface combatant costs approximately $40,000. Tight budgets and increasing recapitalization costs have forced the Navy to examine various methods to reduce the annual operating costs of the fleet. Technological improvements have increased the fidelity and realism of simulators, and simulation is being used more widely for training within the U.S. Navy. Although the Navy's surface combatant community currently uses simulators in its training regimen, an increased use of simulation could improve training efficiency, sustain training readiness, and potentially reduce underway days. This research identified underway training requirements for surface combatants for unit-level training (ULT), the number of underway days required to accomplish that training, and where credit for meeting training requirements through the use of simulation is currently granted. In addition, it identified which training requirements can only be completed underway, which can be completed in port without simulation, and which can be completed in port via simulation. The authors then surveyed available simulation technologies to determine if they could be substituted for training that is currently being performed underway. The research focused on the DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class surface combatants because the DDG-51 class has the greatest number of ships in the surface combatant fleet, providing a large data set for an analysis of training exercises performed.

Open All Close All

type

http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type

about

http://schema.org/about

contributor

http://schema.org/contributor

description

http://schema.org/description

"Constrained budgets and increasing costs have forced the U.S. Navy to search for ways to reduce the annual operating costs of the fleet. One expensive driver of those costs is underway training of surface combatant ship crews. Focusing on the DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class of surface combatants, RAND examines whether and how increased use of simulators could be substituted for underway training without any decrease in readiness."
"The U.S. Navy trains its surface combatant ship crews through a combination of shore-based, onboard pier-side, and underway training. Much of this training has traditionally involved significant periods of underway time, which allows units to achieve required certifications and readiness levels. Underway training is expensive, however, because fuel and consumables are expended while a ship is underway; wear and tear on operating equipment also drive up maintenance costs. One day's worth of fuel for one surface combatant costs approximately $40,000. Tight budgets and increasing recapitalization costs have forced the Navy to examine various methods to reduce the annual operating costs of the fleet. Technological improvements have increased the fidelity and realism of simulators, and simulation is being used more widely for training within the U.S. Navy. Although the Navy's surface combatant community currently uses simulators in its training regimen, an increased use of simulation could improve training efficiency, sustain training readiness, and potentially reduce underway days. This research identified underway training requirements for surface combatants for unit-level training (ULT), the number of underway days required to accomplish that training, and where credit for meeting training requirements through the use of simulation is currently granted. In addition, it identified which training requirements can only be completed underway, which can be completed in port without simulation, and which can be completed in port via simulation. The authors then surveyed available simulation technologies to determine if they could be substituted for training that is currently being performed underway. The research focused on the DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class surface combatants because the DDG-51 class has the greatest number of ships in the surface combatant fleet, providing a large data set for an analysis of training exercises performed."@en
"U.S. Navy surface combatant ship crew training involves a combination of shore-based, onboard pier-side, and underway training. Underway training is expensive, however, and it increases wear and tear on operating equipment. Furthermore, constrained budgets and increasing recapitalization costs have forced the Navy to examine various methods-such as increased use of simulators-to reduce the annual operating costs of the fleet. Technological improvements have increased the fidelity and realism of simulators, and simulation is being used more widely for training within the U.S. Navy, in other navies, and in commercial shipping companies. Although the Navy's surface combatant community currently uses simulators in its training regimen, an increased use of simulation could potentially improve training efficiency, sustain training readiness, and reduce underway days. Focusing on the DDG-51 Arleigh Burke class of surface combatants, RAND examines the training requirements of surface forces, determines where credit is granted for the use of simulation, estimates what training is done underway, examines simulation technology, and identifies areas where simulation could be substituted for underway training without any decrease in readiness. The authors find that although most exercises are done underway, many could be done in port with or without the use of simulators. Accordingly, the Navy should consider (1) investing in shore-based engineering simulators, (2) directing that exercises that can be done in port be done in port, and (3) accelerating the upgrades that are slowly providing DDG-51-class ships with an embedded engineering training capability."@en
""U.S. Navy surface combatant ship crew training involves a combination of shore-based, onboard pier-side, and underway training. Underway training is expensive, however, and it increases wear and tear on operating equipment. Furthermore, constrained budgets and increasing recapitalization costs have forced the Navy to examine various methods -- such as increased use of simulators -- to reduce the annual operating costs of the fleet. Technological improvements have increased the fidelity and realism of simulators, and simulation is being used more widely for training within the U.S. Navy, in other navies, and in commercial shipping companies. Although the Navy's surface combatant community currently uses simulators in its training regimen, an increased use of simulation could potentially improve training efficiency, sustain training readiness, and reduce underway days. Focusing on the DDG-51 Arleigh Burke class of surface combatants, RAND examines the training requirements of surface forces, determines where credit is granted for the use of simulation, estimates what training is done underway, examines simulation technology, and identifies areas where simulation could be substituted for underway training without any decrease in readiness. The authors find that although most exercises are done underway, many could be done in port with or without the use of simulators. Accordingly, the Navy should consider (1) investing in shore-based engineering simulators, (2) directing that exercises that can be done in port be done in port, and (3) accelerating the upgrades that are slowly providing DDG-51-class ships with an embedded engineering training capability."--Publisher's website."@en

name

http://schema.org/name

"An Examination of Options to Reduce Underway Training Days through the Use of Simulation"@en
"An examination of options to reduce underway training days through the use of simulation"@en
"An examination of options to reduce underway training days through the use of simulation"

workExample

http://schema.org/workExample