WorldCat Linked Data Explorer

http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/196915821

Locke and the legislative point of view toleration, contested principles, and law

Determining which moral principles should guide political action is a vexing question in political theory. This is especially true when faced with the "toleration paradox": believing that something is morally wrong but also believing that it is wrong to suppress it. In this book, Alex Tuckness argues that John Locke's potential contribution to this debate--what Tuckness terms the "legislative point of view"--has long been obscured by overemphasis on his doctrine of consent. Building on a line of reasoning Locke made explicit in his later writings on religious toleration, Tuckness explores the idea that we should act politically only on those moral principles that a reasonable legislator would endorse; someone, that is, who would avoid enacting measures that could be self-defeating when applied by fallible human beings. --From publisher's description.

Open All Close All

http://schema.org/about

http://schema.org/description

  • "Determining which moral principles should guide political action is a vexing question in political theory. This is especially true when faced with the "toleration paradox": believing that something is morally wrong but also believing that it is wrong to suppress it. In this book, Alex Tuckness argues that John Locke's potential contribution to this debate--what Tuckness terms the "legislative point of view"--has long been obscured by overemphasis on his doctrine of consent. Building on a line of reasoning Locke made explicit in his later writings on religious toleration, Tuckness explores the idea that we should act politically only on those moral principles that a reasonable legislator would endorse; someone, that is, who would avoid enacting measures that could be self-defeating when applied by fallible human beings. --From publisher's description."@en
  • "Determining which moral principles should guide political action is a vexing question in political theory. This is especially true when faced with the "toleration paradox": believing that something is morally wrong but also believing that it is wrong to s."@en
  • "Determining which moral principles should guide political action is a vexing question in political theory. This is especially true when faced with the "toleration paradox": believing that something is morally wrong but also believing that it is wrong to s."
  • "Determining which moral principles should guide political action is a vexing question in political theory. This is especially true when faced with the "toleration paradox": believing that something is morally wrong but also believing that it is wrong to suppress it. In this book, Alex Tuckness argues that John Locke's potential contribution to this debate--what Tuckness terms the "legislative point of view"--Has long been obscured by overemphasis on his doctrine of consent. Building on a line of reasoning Locke made explicit in his later writings on religious toleration, Tuckness explores the."@en

http://schema.org/genre

  • "Electronic resource"@en
  • "Electronic books"
  • "Electronic books"@en
  • "Livres électroniques"

http://schema.org/name

  • "Locke and the legislative point of view toleration, contested principles, and law"
  • "Locke and the legislative point of view toleration, contested principles, and law"@en
  • "Locke and the legislative point of view : toleration, contested principles and the law"
  • "Locke and the legislative point of view : toleration, contested principles, and law"
  • "Locke and the legislative point of view : toleration, contested principles, and the law"
  • "Locke and the Legislative Point of View Toleration, Contested Principles, and the Law"@en
  • "Locke and the legislative point of view toleration, contested principles, and the law"@en
  • "Locke and the legislative point of view toleration, contested principles, and the law"
  • "Locke and the Legislative Point of View"