Linked Data Explorer

"An impartial examination of the second volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans In which the reflections of that author, upon King James I. and King Charles I. are proved to be groundless: ... By Zachary Grey ... With an appendix, in answer to two ... complaints of the dissenters"@en
"An impartial examination of the second volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans In which the reflections of that author, upon King James I. and King Charles I. are proved to be groundless: ... By Zachary Grey, ... With an appendix, in answer to two ... complaints of the dissenters"
"An impartial examination of the second volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans In which the reflections of that author, upon King James I. and King Charles I. are proved to be groundless: His misrepresentations of the conduct of the prelates of those times, fully detected: And his numerous mistakes in history, and unfair way of quoting his authorities, exposed to publick view. By Zachary Grey, L L.D. Rector of houghton-conquest in Bedfordshire. With an appendix, in answer to two common, but unreasonable complaints of the dissenters against the Establish'd church. I. That in 1662, they were obliged to subscribe to the review of the Litugy, before they could fee it. II. That in king James II's time, their assistance in writing against the papists, was absolutely refused by the licenses of the press"
"An impartial examination of the second[-fourth] volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans"@en
"An impartial examination of the second[-fourth] volume[s] of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans"@en
"An impartial examination of the second volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans. In which the reflections of that author, upon King James I. and King Charles I. are proved to be groundless: His misrepresentations of the conduct of the prelates of those times, fully detected: And his numerous mistakes in history, and unfair way of quoting his authorities, exposed to publick view. By Zachary Grey, L L.D. Rector of houghton-conquest in Bedfordshire. With an appendix, in answer to two common, but unreasonable complaints of the dissenters against the Establish'd church. I. That in 1662, they were obliged to subscribe to the review of the Litugy, before they could fee it. II. That in king James II's time, their assistance in writing against the papists, was absolutely refused by the licenses of the press"@en
"An impartial examination of the second-[fourth] volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans"@en
"An impartial examination of the second volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans : In which the reflections of that author, upon King James I. and King Charles I. are proved to be groundless: ... By Zachary Grey ... With an appendix, in answer to two ... complaints of the dissenters"@en
"An impartial examination of the second volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans. In which the reflections of that author, upon King James I. and King Charles I. are proved to be groundless: ... By Zachary Grey ... With an appendix, in answer to two ... complaints of the dissenters"@en
"An impartial examination of the second volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans"
"An impartial examination of the second volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans"@en
"An impartial examination of the second volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans : in which the reflections of that author, upon King James I. and King Charles I. are proved to be groundless"@en
"An impartial examination of the second volume of Mr. Daniel Neal's History of the Puritans : In which the reflections of that author, upon King James I. and King Charles I. are proved to be groundless: ... By Zachary Grey, ... With an appendix, in answer to two ... complaints of the dissenters"

workExample

http://schema.org/workExample