WorldCat Linked Data Explorer

http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/2681059

The irony of free speech

How free is the speech of someone who can't be heard? Not very - and this, Owen Fiss suggests, is where the First Amendment comes in. In this book, a marvel of conciseness and eloquence, Fiss reframes the debate over free speech to reflect the First Amendment's role in ensuring public debate that is, in Justice William Brennan's words, truly "uninhibited, robust, and wide-open." By examining the silencing effects of speech - its power to overwhelm and intimidate the underfunded, underrepresented, or disadvantaged voice - Fiss shows how restrictions on political expenditures, hate speech, and pornography can be defended in terms of the First Amendment, not despite it. Similarly, when the state requires the media to air voices of opposition, or funds art that presents controversial or challenging points of view, it is doing its constitutional part to protect democratic self-rule from the aggregations of private power that threaten it.

Open All Close All

http://schema.org/about

http://schema.org/description

  • "Trata do papel do Estado na garantia das liberdades de expressão e de imprensa. Estuda a regulação de conteúdo pornográfico, a alocação de subsídios estatais para atividades culturais e a regulação dos meios de comunicação de massa, temas em debate na Suprema Corte norte-americana nas últimas duas décadas."
  • "Trata do papel do Estado na garantia das liberdades de expressão e de imprensa. Estuda a regulação de conteúdo pornográfico, a alocação de subsídios estatais para atividades culturais e a regulação dos meios de comunicação de massa, temas em debate na Suprema Corte norte-americana nas últimas duas décadas."@pt
  • "How free is the speech of someone who can't be heard? Not very - and this, Owen Fiss suggests, is where the First Amendment comes in. In this book, a marvel of conciseness and eloquence, Fiss reframes the debate over free speech to reflect the First Amendment's role in ensuring public debate that is, in Justice William Brennan's words, truly "uninhibited, robust, and wide-open." By examining the silencing effects of speech - its power to overwhelm and intimidate the underfunded, underrepresented, or disadvantaged voice - Fiss shows how restrictions on political expenditures, hate speech, and pornography can be defended in terms of the First Amendment, not despite it. Similarly, when the state requires the media to air voices of opposition, or funds art that presents controversial or challenging points of view, it is doing its constitutional part to protect democratic self-rule from the aggregations of private power that threaten it."@en
  • "How free is the speech of someone who can't be heard? Not very - and this, Owen Fiss suggests, is where the First Amendment comes in. In this book, a marvel of conciseness and eloquence, Fiss reframes the debate over free speech to reflect the First Amendment's role in ensuring public debate that is, in Justice William Brennan's words, truly "uninhibited, robust, and wide-open." By examining the silencing effects of speech - its power to overwhelm and intimidate the underfunded, underrepresented, or disadvantaged voice - Fiss shows how restrictions on political expenditures, hate speech, and pornography can be defended in terms of the First Amendment, not despite it. Similarly, when the state requires the media to air voices of opposition, or funds art that presents controversial or challenging points of view, it is doing its constitutional part to protect democratic self-rule from the aggregations of private power that threaten it."

http://schema.org/name

  • "A Ironia da liberdade de expressão : estado, regulação e diversidade na esfera pública"@pt
  • "La ironía de la libertad de expresión"@es
  • "La ironía de la libertad de expresión"
  • "A ironia da liberdade de expressão : estado, regulação e diversidade na esfera pública"
  • "The irony of free speech"@en
  • "The irony of free speech"
  • "La Ironía de la libertad de expresión"
  • "The Irony of free speech"