Linked Data Explorerhttp://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/476192237
The Exercitation answered in the assertions following made good against it. 1 That the usurpation pretended by the exercitator is really no usurpation, by any thing that he hath said to prove it such. 2 That former oaths in controversie oblige not against obedience to present powers. 3 That obedience is due to powers in possession, though unlawfully enter'd
Open All Close All
http://schema.org/about
- http://worldcat.org/entity/person/id/2644793917
- http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1204623
- http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85003639
- http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/476192237#Topic/obedience_religious_aspects_christianity_early_works_to_1800
- http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85093593
- http://id.worldcat.org/fast/805505
- http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1042646
- http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/476192237#Topic/oaths_england_early_works_to_1800
- http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1042714
- http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/476192237#Place/great_britain
- http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/476192237#Topic/allegiance_early_works_to_1800
- http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1219920
- http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85093631
- http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1919741
- http://worldcat.org/entity/person/id/2632528977
- http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/476192237#Event/1649_1660
http://schema.org/name
- "The Exercitation answered in the assertions following made good against it. 1 That the usurpation pretended by the exercitator is really no usurpation, by any thing that he hath said to prove it such. 2 That former oaths in controversie oblige not against obedience to present powers. 3 That obedience is due to powers in possession, though unlawfully enter'd"@en
- "The Exercitation answered, in the assertions following made good against it. 1 That the usurpation pretended by the exercitator is really no usurpation, by any thing that he hath said to prove it such. 2 That former oaths in controversie oblige not against obedience to present powers. 3 That obedience is due to powers in possession, though unlawfully enter'd"@en
- "The Exercitation answered"
- "The exercitation answered, in the assertions following made good against it. 1 That the usurpation pretended by the exercitator is really no usurpation, by any thing that he hath said to prove it such. 2 That former oaths in controversie oblige not against obedience to present powers. 3 That obedience is due to powers in possession, though unlawfully enter'd"@en
- "The Exercitation answered, : in the assertions following made good against it. 1 That the usurpation pretended by the exercitator is really no usurpation, by any thing that he hath said to prove it such. 2 That former oaths in controversie oblige not against obedience to present powers. 3 That obedience is due to powers in possession, though unlawfully enter'd"@en