WorldCat Linked Data Explorer

http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/66570817

Economic Development, Education and Transnational Corporations

This book focuses on the questions of: why do some economically disadvantaged nations develop significantly faster than others, and what roles do their educational systems play? As case illustrations, in the early 1960s Mexico and South Korea were both equally underdeveloped agrarian societies. Since that time, the development strategies pursued by each country resulted in dramatically different results. By the turn of the century South Korea possessed one of the finest educational systems in the world and was a world-class producer of high-tech products. Mexico, on the other hand, was still graduating less than half of its secondary school-age students and bogged down in assembling products owned by others. The book addresses the issues of what happened and why, and frames the consequences for other developing nations facing similar challenges. Professor Hanson argues that the key to understanding involves the manner and intensity in which these countries engaged their educational, governmental and business institutions to acquire manufacturing knowledge from offshored transnational corporations, and how they used these insights to grow their own local industries. Whereas South Korea studied the foreign outsourced plants as if they were educational systems and pursued with tenacity the new knowledge they possessed, Mexico viewed them as "cash cows" that generated wages and reduced unemployment. The author emphasizes that significant educational reform will only break down the barriers of institutional bureaucracies when responding to the pressures and demands of industrialization. This is one of the first books of its kind to compare South-East Asian and Latin American economies and their links to educational systems.

Open All Close All

http://schema.org/about

http://schema.org/description

  • "This book focuses on the questions of: why do some economically disadvantaged nations develop significantly faster than others, and what roles do their educational systems play? As case illustrations, in the early 1960s Mexico and South Korea were both equally underdeveloped agrarian societies. Since that time, the development strategies pursued by each country resulted in dramatically different results. By the turn of the century South Korea possessed one of the finest educational systems in the world and was a world-class producer of high-tech products. Mexico, on the other hand, was still graduating less than half of its secondary school-age students and bogged down in assembling products owned by others. The book addresses the issues of what happened and why, and frames the consequences for other developing nations facing similar challenges. Professor Hanson argues that the key to understanding involves the manner and intensity in which these countries engaged their educational, governmental and business institutions to acquire manufacturing knowledge from offshored transnational corporations, and how they used these insights to grow their own local industries. Whereas South Korea studied the foreign outsourced plants as if they were educational systems and pursued with tenacity the new knowledge they possessed, Mexico viewed them as "cash cows" that generated wages and reduced unemployment. The author emphasizes that significant educational reform will only break down the barriers of institutional bureaucracies when responding to the pressures and demands of industrialization. This is one of the first books of its kind to compare South-East Asian and Latin American economies and their links to educational systems."@en
  • "When asked to point out the nations that have gone through an accelerated rate of development since the 1960s, most people point to South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Ireland, and most recently, China. Significantly, all these nations had at least one common element at the core of their development strategies, and its analysis is what this book is all about. The primary argument is that when located in a developing country, the foreign higher-tech transnational corporations (TNCs) knowingly or unknowingly function like schools transferring knowledge to local institutions that can accelerate that country up learning and development curves. By knowledge the author refers to, for example: management techniques, technology, technical expertise, job skills, production methods, and R & D capabilities. The local institutions are, universities, public schools, vocational training institutions, domestic industry, and business centers. The local acquisition of this TNC knowledge, however, is not automatic and must be pursued (and applied) tenaciously within the context of a national development strategy (also a subject of this book)."@en

http://schema.org/genre

  • "Reports - Evaluative"@en
  • "Books"@en
  • "Electronic books"@en
  • "Livres électroniques"

http://schema.org/name

  • "Economic Development, Education and Transnational Corporations"@en
  • "Economic development, education and transnational corporations"@en
  • "Economic development, education and transnational corporations"
  • "Economic Development, Education and Transnational Corporations.Routledge Studies in Development Economics"@en
  • "Economic Development, Education and Transnational : Corporations"