"Libre arbitre." . . "Abortion Law and legislation United States." . . "Grossesse Aspect moral." . . "Human reproduction." . . "Pregnancy United States." . . "Women's rights United States." . . "Women's Rights legislation & jurisprudence United States." . . "Government policy." . . "Avortement." . . . . "Pregnancy." . . "Abortion Moral and ethical aspects 20th century Case studies United States." . . "United States" . . "Abortion Government policy United States." . . "Abortion Government policy" . . "Schwangerschaftsabbruch." . . "Law and legislation." . . "Abortus provocatus." . . "avortement Etats-Unis." . . "Avortement États-Unis." . "Abortion, Legal economics United States." . . "Reproduction humaine Aspect moral." . . "Abortion Law and legislation Case studies United States 20th century." . . "Women's rights Moral and ethical aspects 20th century Case studies United States." . . "Abortion." . . "Financing, Government legislation & jurisprudence United States." . . "avortement morale." . . "Reproduction humaine." . . "Womens rights." . . "Abortion Law and legislation" . . "Aspect moral." . . "Women's rights" . . "Women's rights." . "Abortion Government policy 20th century Case studies United States." . . "Rechtspolitik." . . "avortement morale Etats-Unis." . . "USA." . . "Avortement Aspect moral." . . "Abortion Moral and ethical aspects." . . "Abortion Moral and ethical aspects" . "USA" . . "Abort" . . "Femmes Droits États-Unis." . . "Human reproduction Moral and ethical aspects 20th century Case studies United States." . . "Public Policy United States." . . "Rechtsethik." . . "Grossesse." . . "Droits de la femme." . . "Politique gouvernementale." . . "Moral and ethical aspects." . . "grossesse morale." . . "Human reproduction Moral and ethical aspects." . . "Human reproduction Moral and ethical aspects" . "Pregnancy Moral and ethical aspects." . . "Pregnancy Moral and ethical aspects" . . . "Breaking the abortion deadlock : from the choice to consent"@en . . . . . . . . . "This text attempts to reframe abortion rights by focusing not on a woman's right to choose abortion, but rather on a woman's right to consent to pregnancy. Drawing on legal, medical and philosophical definitions of pregnancy, it argues that men and women h."@en . . . . . . "Breaking the abortion deadlock from choice to consent"@en . "Breaking the abortion deadlock from choice to consent" . "Livres électroniques" . . . . . . . . . . "Breaking the abortion deadlock : from choice to consent"@en . . "Breaking the abortion deadlock : from choice to consent" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme)" . . . . . . "Livre électronique (Descripteur de forme)" . . . . . "Electronic books"@en . . . . . . . . . . "For over twenty years the abortion debate has raged, with each side entrenched in unyielding positions. This book breaks the impasse by using pro-life premises to reach pro-choice conclusions. While it is commonly assumed that state protection of the fetus as a form of human life undermines women's reproductive rights, McDonagh instead illuminates how it is exactly such state protection of the fetus that strengthens, rather than weakens, not only women's right to an abortion, but even more significantly, women's ability to call on the state for abortion funding. McDonagh's approach, by bridging the divide between pro-life and pro-choice advocates, revolutionizes the abortion debate in a way that opens up a whole new avenue for resolving the abortion conflict and advancing women's rights. McDonagh reframes the abortion debate by locating the missing piece of the puzzle: the fetus as the cause of pregnancy. After exposing the myths on this subject, her exacting analysis presents the scientific and legal evidence that the ultimate source of pregnancy is the fetus. The central issue then becomes what the fetus, as an active agent, does to a woman's body during pregnancy, whether that pregnancy is wanted or not. McDonagh graphically describes the massive changes produced by the fetus when it takes over a woman's body. As such, pregnancy is best depicted not as a condition that women have a right to choose but rather as a condition to which they must have a right to consent. Abortion, therefore, does not rest on the intensely debated principle, stated in Roe, that women have a right to be free from state interference when choosing privately what to do with their own bodies. Instead, as McDonagh's book explains, abortion rights flow inevitably from women's more established right to consent to what another agent does to their body. Specifically, women have a right to resist an unwanted intrusion by a fetus as well as to receive help from the state to stop such an intrusion. Moving abortion rights from choice to consent has broad legal and cultural ramifications tapping into the very cornerstone of the American political system: consent." . "Breaking the Abortion Deadlock From Choice to Consent"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "This text attempts to reframe abortion rights by focusing not on a woman's right to choose abortion, but rather on a woman's right to consent to pregnancy. Drawing on legal, medical and philosophical definitions of pregnancy, it argues that men and women have equal right to bodily integrity."@en . . . "Avortement Politique gouvernementale États-Unis." . . "Avortement Droit États-Unis." . . "Consentement éclairé (Droit médical)" . . "Pregnancy Moral and ethical aspects 20th century Case studies United States." . . "avortement politique publique Etats-Unis." . .