WorldCat Linked Data Explorer

http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/803204167

Counter-terrorism and international power relations the EU, ASEAN and hegemonic global governace

Why do states and international relations organisations participate in the 'global war on terrorism'? This book asks this question within a broad framework, exploring the mechanisms and causes for participation in global governance and taking counter terrorism as a pertinent case. Challenging the assumption of egalitarian structures of global governance, the author argues that power relations and the use of power (influence, coercion and force) play a more important role than previously suggested. Providing a critical assessment of the counter terrorism policies of EU, US and ASEAN, the book i.

Open All Close All

http://schema.org/about

http://schema.org/description

  • "Why do states and international relations organisations participate in the 'global war on terrorism'? This book asks this question within a broad framework, exploring the mechanisms and causes for participation in global governance and taking counter terrorism as a pertinent case. Challenging the assumption of egalitarian structures of global governance, the author argues that power relations and the use of power (influence, coercion and force) play a more important role than previously suggested. Providing a critical assessment of the counter terrorism policies of EU, US and ASEAN, the book i."@en
  • "A dialogue between established International Relations theory and global governance literature may promote a novel synthetic framework for understanding the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT). The author wishes to explore and develop a new security studies perspective which will restate and reinterpret George W. Bush's GWOT. The argument promoted here centres around the claim that in its GWOT the USA has engaged in the creation of an under-researched form of global governance, hegemonic governance, by which the hegemon persuades and coerces states across the globe to cooperate in the battle against sub-state terrorism. This requires a new understanding of global governance, as usually the main strand of global governance literature theorises and describes global governance as heterarchic, with equal partners interacting to order their common affairs (Miura 2004; McGrew 2000).1 The main purpose of this study is to challenge this particular assertion.[From author's introduction]."@en

http://schema.org/genre

  • "Electronic books"@en
  • "Livres électroniques"

http://schema.org/name

  • "Counter-terrorism and international power relations the EU, ASEAN and hegemonic global governace"@en
  • "Counterterrorism and International Power Relations the EU, ASEAN and Hegemonic Global Governance"@en
  • "Counter-terrorism and International Power Relations the EU, ASEAN and Hegemonic Global Governance"@en
  • "Counter Terrorism and International Power Relations : The EU, ASEAN and Hegemonic Global Governance"
  • "Counterterrorism and international power relations the EU, ASEAN and hegemonic global governance"
  • "Counterterrorism and international power relations the EU, ASEAN and hegemonic global governance"@en
  • "Counterterrorism and international power relations : the EU, ASEAN and hegemonic global governance"
  • "Counterterrorism and international power relations : the EU, ASEAN and hegemonic global governance"@en