"Diplomatic relations." . . "Diplomatic relations" . "East Asia Foreign relations China." . . "Asie orientale" . . "United States" . . "United States." . "Macht." . . "China Foreign relations East Asia." . . "China" . . "China." . "United States Foreign relations East Asia." . . "POLITICAL SCIENCE Government International." . . "East Asia" . . "East Asia." . . . "Équilibre des puissances." . . "Foreign relations" . . "East Asia Foreign relations United States." . . "Ostasien." . . "Balance of power." . . "Balance of power" . "Chine" . . "USA." . . "China Foreign relations United States." . . "POLITICAL SCIENCE International Relations General." . . "Internationale Politik." . . "États-Unis" . . "Politische Macht." . . . . "Looking for balance China, the United States, and power balancing in East Asia" . "Looking for balance China, the United States, and power balancing in East Asia"@en . . . . . . . . . "Debate surrounding \"China's rise,\" and the prospects of its possible challenge to America's preeminence in international relations in East Asia, has focused on two questions, rooted in power-balancing theory: whether the United States should \"contain\" or \"engage\" China; and whether the rise of Chinese power has inclined other East Asian states to \"balance\" against Beijing by alignment with the United States. By drawing on alternative theoretic approaches--most especially \"balance-of-threat\" theory, political economic theory, and theories surrounding regime survival in multilateral rather than bi."@en . . . . . . "Looking for Balance China, the United States, and Power Balancing in East Asia"@en . "Livres électroniques" . . . . . . . . . . . "Debate surrounding \"China's rise,\" and the prospects of its possible challenge to America's preeminence, has focused on two questions : whether the United States should \"contain\" or \"engage\" China; and whether the rise of Chinese power has inclined other East Asian states to \"balance\" against Beijing by alignment with the United States or ramping up their military expenditures. By drawing on alternative theoretic approaches, most especially \"balance-of-threat\" theory, political economic theory, and theories of regime survival and economic interdependence, Steve Chan is able to create an explanation of regional developments that differs widely from the traditional \"strategic vision\" of national interest. He concludes that China's primary aim is not to match U.S. military might or the foreign policy influence that flows from that power, and that its neighbors are not balancing against its rising power because, in today's guns-versus-butter fiscal reality, balancing policies would entail forfeiting possible gains that can accrue from cooperation, economic growth, and the application of GDP to nonmilitary ends. Instead, most East Asian countries have collectively pivoted to a strategy of elite legitimacy and regime survival based on economic performance. Steve Chan is the author of China, the U.S., and the Power-Transition Theory: A Critique, and Enduring Rivalries in the Asia Pacific."@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Electronic books"@en . "Looking for balance : China, the United States, and power balancing in East Asia"@en . "Looking for balance : China, the United States, and power balancing in East Asia" . "United States Foreign relations China." . . "Gleichgewichtspolitik." . .