WorldCat Linked Data Explorer

http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/827160476

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission the campaign finance reform case

"This title is from an eight-volume set that examines First Amendment cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Each similarly structured program features legal scholar David L. Hudson Jr. introducing the featured case before main arguments are presented through dramatizations. Following the decision, the verdict is discussed and debated by various experts. Video and audio resolution is extremely high, with the mix of dramatizations and onscreen commentaries adding visual variety. Although one might think this case deals exclusively with pornography issues, the scope is much wider, with the decision delving into censorship-versus-selection issues, library roles and responsibilities, and more. The verdict in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale: The Gay Scoutmaster Case also touches upon subjects beyond homosexuality, including the right of associations to assemble and propagate viewpoints. Other series titles introduce cases involving school vouchers, digital intercept, the 10 Commandments, whistle-blowers, campaign-finance reform, and dog fighting. Contains a downloadable teachers' guide and audio of Supreme Court oral arguments."--Booklist

Open All Close All

http://schema.org/alternateName

  • "Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission"@en
  • "Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission"
  • "Campaign finance reform case"@en
  • "Campaign finance reform case"

http://schema.org/description

  • "In the late 19th Century, the United States Supreme Court viewed corporations as persons for purposes of free speech protection. Citizens United v Federal Election Commission confronts the question, "Does the contribution of money or the spending of money in a political campaign constitute protected speech. In other words, is money speech or is money property? ""
  • ""This title is from an eight-volume set that examines First Amendment cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Each similarly structured program features legal scholar David L. Hudson Jr. introducing the featured case before main arguments are presented through dramatizations. Following the decision, the verdict is discussed and debated by various experts. Video and audio resolution is extremely high, with the mix of dramatizations and onscreen commentaries adding visual variety. Although one might think this case deals exclusively with pornography issues, the scope is much wider, with the decision delving into censorship-versus-selection issues, library roles and responsibilities, and more. The verdict in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale: The Gay Scoutmaster Case also touches upon subjects beyond homosexuality, including the right of associations to assemble and propagate viewpoints. Other series titles introduce cases involving school vouchers, digital intercept, the 10 Commandments, whistle-blowers, campaign-finance reform, and dog fighting. Contains a downloadable teachers' guide and audio of Supreme Court oral arguments."--Booklist"@en

http://schema.org/genre

  • "Legal films"
  • "Legal films"@en
  • "Documentary films"@en
  • "Documentary films"
  • "Trials, litigation, etc"@en
  • "Trials, litigation, etc"
  • "Nonfiction films"@en
  • "Nonfiction films"
  • "Video recordings for the hearing impaired"@en
  • "Video recordings for the hearing impaired"

http://schema.org/name

  • "Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission the campaign finance reform case"@en
  • "Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission the campaign finance reform case"