WorldCat Linked Data Explorer

http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/836778365

Iraq and the United States creating a strategic partnership

It is far too early to say that Iraq can achieve lasting security and stability, maintain a pluralistic form of government, or avoid becoming caught up in another violent round of internal or regional power struggles. Iraq's success will depend largely on Iraq's leaders and their decisions. Iraq is now a fully sovereign state that is rapidly assuming responsibility for every aspect of its policy and security. The United States can, however, play a constructive role in helping Iraq as it reduces its aid programs and withdraws its forces. The U.S.-Iraqi Strategic Framework Agreement (SFA) provides a potential framework to build upon that can serve both nations' strategic interests. It also provides a mechanism through which the United States can help Iraq during the critical period in which it chooses a new government, increases its petroleum exports and national income, deals with remaining elements of insurgency and internal conflict, and develops the capabilities necessary to deter any threat from its neighbors. In fact, unless it makes effective use of the agreement to help Iraq during the withdrawal of its forces between 2010 and 2011, and unless it provides effective aid and advice during the critical transition period that follows, the United States runs a serious risk of seeing Iraq fail -- in political accommodation, in developing effective governance and security forces, and in creating a climate where it can begin to fund its own economic development. The result could be an Iraq too weak and too divided to achieve either security or stability.

Open All Close All

http://schema.org/alternateName

  • "Iraq: a situation report"@en
  • "Iraq and the US"
  • "Iraq and the U.S"

http://schema.org/description

  • "If Iraq and the United States are to win the war in any meaningful and lasting sense, they must translate the Strategic Agreement they signed in November 2008 into a lasting and functional strategic partnership. In the process, the United States must put Iraq firmly in the lead, but sustain the kind of aid and advice that will help Iraq make further progress in political accommodation, the quality of governance, economic development, and security. The CSIS Burke Chair in Strategy conducted a detailed analysis of the current situation in Iraq, the challenges Iraq faces, and the actions the United States needs to take to help Iraq meet those challenges. Its report provides a detailed risk assessment of current and potential levels of violence in Iraq. It addresses the levels of political accommodation and stability and the problems Iraq still faces in the aftermath of the national election. It also addresses the opportunities and problems in developing Iraq's petroleum sector; investment and development issues in other sectors, the problems in the Iraqi budget forecasts, and progress in Iraqi reconstruction. It evaluates the need for continued economic aid and advice and describes U.S. options for extending such assistance. The concluding section examines progress in creating Iraqi military and police forces. It examines the role the United States can play in helping Iraq further develop such forces and analyzes what a strategic partnership, based on the Strategic Agreement, should mean."
  • "It is far too early to say that Iraq can achieve lasting security and stability, maintain a pluralistic form of government, or avoid becoming caught up in another violent round of internal or regional power struggles. Iraq's success will depend largely on Iraq's leaders and their decisions. Iraq is now a fully sovereign state that is rapidly assuming responsibility for every aspect of its policy and security. The United States can, however, play a constructive role in helping Iraq as it reduces its aid programs and withdraws its forces. The U.S.-Iraqi Strategic Framework Agreement (SFA) provides a potential framework to build upon that can serve both nations' strategic interests. It also provides a mechanism through which the United States can help Iraq during the critical period in which it chooses a new government, increases its petroleum exports and national income, deals with remaining elements of insurgency and internal conflict, and develops the capabilities necessary to deter any threat from its neighbors. In fact, unless it makes effective use of the agreement to help Iraq during the withdrawal of its forces between 2010 and 2011, and unless it provides effective aid and advice during the critical transition period that follows, the United States runs a serious risk of seeing Iraq fail -- in political accommodation, in developing effective governance and security forces, and in creating a climate where it can begin to fund its own economic development. The result could be an Iraq too weak and too divided to achieve either security or stability."@en
  • ""If Iraq and the United States are to win the war in any meaningful and lasting sense, they must translate the Strategic Agreement they signed in November 2008 into a lasting and functional strategic partnership. In the process, the United States must put Iraq firmly in the lead, but sustain the kind of aid and advice that will help Iraq make further progress in political accommodation, the quality of governance, economic development, and security. The CSIS Burke Chair in Strategy conducted a detailed analysis of the current situation in Iraq, the challenges Iraq faces, and the actions the United States needs to take to help Iraq meet those challenges. Its report provides a detailed risk assessment of current and potential levels of violence in Iraq. It addresses the levels of political accommodation and stability and the problems Iraq still faces in the aftermath of the national election. It also addresses the opportunities and problems in developing Iraq's petroleum sector; investment and development issues in other sectors, the problems in the Iraqi budget forecasts, and progress in Iraqi reconstruction. It evaluates the need for continued economic aid and advice and describes U.S. options for extending such assistance. The concluding section examines progress in creating Iraqi military and police forces. It examines the role the United States can play in helping Iraq further develop such forces and analyzes what a strategic partnership, based on the Strategic Agreement, should mean." -- Abstract on hosting webpage, viewed 05 May 2011."@en
  • "Iraq is now a fully sovereign state that is rapidly assuming responsibility for every aspect of its policy and security. The US can, however, play a constructive role in helping Iraq as it withdraws its forces and over the years to come. The US-Iraqi strategic agreement provides a potential framework to build upon that can serve both nation's strategic interests. Much will depend, however, on how quickly the U.S. shows Iraq that it is a responsible strategic partner, that it respects Iraqi sovereignty and leadership, and that the US is willing to provide continuing aid and support. The US must now redefine every aspect of its relationship with Iraq. It must act immediately to complete the shift from the role an occupier to that of a strategic partner where it is clear to both sides that Iraq is the lead. In the process, the US must quickly complete a shift in leadership away from the Department of Defense, focused on armed nation building; to an initiative led by the State Department, focused on aid, advice, and support of the Iraqi government. At the same time, both states need to recognize that they can benefit from translating their Strategic Agreement into programs that help ensure Iraq's security and development. This requires a new form of partnership where Iraq is firmly in the lead and in control, but both nations work together in ways which that from occupation to making Iraq a nation that can play a major role in ensuring the stability of the Gulf and the world's energy supplies. Iraq needs to recognize that it can benefit from continuing US aid and advice in developing its security forces and its economy. The US needs to recognize that while Iraq will often disagree with US policies and pursue a different course of action, it can play a critical role in containing Iran, fighting Jihadist extremist and terrorism, and reducing the tension between Arab and Kurd that is now a growing problem in the region."@en

http://schema.org/name

  • "Iraq and the United States : creating a strategic partnership"
  • "Iraq and the United States Creating a Strategic Partnership"
  • "Iraq and the United States creating a strategic partnership"@en
  • "Iraq and the United States creating a strategic partnership"
  • "Iraq creating a strategic partnership"@en