WorldCat Linked Data Explorer

http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/837050859

Dying to know : public release of information about quality of health care

Public disclosure of the comparative performance of health care providers is seen as one mechanism for improving quality of care and controlling health care costs. This report, the result of a collaboration between the Nuffield Trust in London and RAND, assesses the U.S. experience with publicly releasing health care performance data and offers guidelines for establishing public disclosure policy in the United Kingdom. Because the United States leads the world in reporting clinical information by hospital and by physician name, this report will be of interest to any country considering public release of performance data. Principal findings: Despite a rapidly expanding report card industry, U.S. physicians are skeptical about report cards, and consumers and purchasers rarely use them. Hospitals may respond to performance data with internal changes, especially in a competitive environment. Publishing comparative mortality data seems to improve outcomes, but the mechanism by which this happens is unclear. Key recommendations: Public disclosure should be viewed as an evolutionary process, becoming more sophisticated and comprehensive over time. Disclosure should be a tool to support all quality initiatives in the U.K. National Health Service. Provider organizations should be a key audience for performance information. Health professionals should be fully involved in the public disclosure process. Both process and outcome measures of quality should be published. Public disclosure should be accompanied by possible explanations for the variations reported.

Open All Close All

http://schema.org/about

http://schema.org/description

  • "Public disclosure of the comparative performance of health care providers is seen as one mechanism for improving quality of care and controlling health care costs. This report, the result of a collaboration between the Nuffield Trust in London and RAND, assesses the U.S. experience with publicly releasing health care performance data and offers guidelines for establishing public disclosure policy in the United Kingdom. Because the United States leads the world in reporting clinical information by hospital and by physician name, this report will be of interest to any country considering public release of performance data. Principal findings: Despite a rapidly expanding report card industry, U.S. physicians are skeptical about report cards, and consumers and purchasers rarely use them. Hospitals may respond to performance data with internal changes, especially in a competitive environment. Publishing comparative mortality data seems to improve outcomes, but the mechanism by which this happens is unclear. Key recommendations: Public disclosure should be viewed as an evolutionary process, becoming more sophisticated and comprehensive over time. Disclosure should be a tool to support all quality initiatives in the U.K. National Health Service. Provider organizations should be a key audience for performance information. Health professionals should be fully involved in the public disclosure process. Both process and outcome measures of quality should be published. Public disclosure should be accompanied by possible explanations for the variations reported."@en
  • "The purpose of this monograph is to examine the theory behind this assumption of synergy, to identify evidence that supports or refutes the theory, and to suggest the practical and feasible implications of developing a system for public release of information about quality. The recent Institute of Medicine report on medical errors in the United States signals that improving quality of care will be a central political issue for most countries in the developed world in this century. Both the evidence and prior experience suggest that improving quality will be extraordinarily difficult. Thus, it is appropriate and timely that we examine carefully the role that public release of information might play in facilitating more rapid improvement in medical care systems. By examining the contribution of public disclosure of information in the United States, which has experimented most with this technique, we hope to increase our understanding of how quality improvement efforts can be successfully implemented in the UK, and to help quality of care improve more rapidly in the first three decades of the 21st century than it did in the last three decades of the 20th."@en

http://schema.org/name

  • "Dying to know : public release of information about quality of health care"
  • "Dying to know : public release of information about quality of health care"@en
  • "Dying to know public release of information about quality of health care"@en
  • "Dying to Know Public Release of Information about Quality of Health Care"@en