Linked Data Explorer

"Business cycles are both less volatile and more synchronized with the world cycle in rich countries than in poor ones. We develop two alternative explanations based on the idea that comparative advantage causes rich countries to specialize in industries that use new technologies operated by skilled workers, while poor countries specialize in industries that use traditional technologies operated by unskilled workers. Since new technologies are difficult to imitate, the industries of rich countries enjoy more market power and face more inelastic product demands than those of poor countries. Since skilled workers are less likely to exit employment as a result of changes in economic conditions, industries in rich countries face more inelastic labour supplies than those of poor countries. We show that either asymmetry in industry characteristics can generate cross-country differences in business cycles that resemble those we observe in the data. Keywords: International Capital Flows, Sovereigned risk, Country Portfolios. JEL Classification: F32, F34."@en
"July 1998 Business cycles are different in rich and poor countries-because the industries in which each group of countries specialize respond differently to domestic and foreign shocks. Business cycles are less volatile in rich countries than in poor ones. They are also more synchronized with the world cycle. Kraay and Ventura develop two alternative but noncompeting explanations for those facts. Both explanations proceed from the observation that the law of comparative advantage causes rich and poor countries to specialize in the production of different commodities. In particular, rich countries specialize in high-tech products produced by skilled workers and poor countries specialize in low-tech products produced by unskilled workers. Cross-country differences in business cycles then arise as a result of asymmetries among the industries in which different countries specialize. Kraay and Ventura focus on two such asymmetries. The first, which they label the competition bias hypothesis, is based on the idea that cross-country differences in production costs are more prevalent in high-tech industries, sheltering producers from foreign competition and therefore making them large suppliers in the markets for their products. The second, which they label the cyclical bias hypothesis, is based on the idea that production costs in low-tech industries may be more sensitive to the shocks that drive business cycles. This paper-a product of Macroeconomics and Growth, Development Research Group-is part of a larger effort in the group to study open-economy macroeconomics. Aart Kraay may be contacted at [email protected]."@en

genre

http://schema.org/genre

"Llibres electrònics"

name

http://schema.org/name

"Comparative Advantage and the Cross-Section of Business Cycles"@en
"Comparative advantage and the cross section of business cycles"
"Comparative Advantage and the Cross-section of Business Cycles"@en
"Comparative Advantage and the Cross-section of Business Cycles"
"Comparative advantage and the cross-section of business cycles"
"Comparative advantage and the cross-section of business cycles"@en

workExample

http://schema.org/workExample